中国学习者习得英语非宾格动词的新实证研究/外语语言文学博士论丛

作者简介

本书采用横向设计的方法，调查了四组不同水平的中国学习者。主要的研究工具是控制性书面产出任务和可接受性判断任务。除此之外，还使用了访谈和英语教材语料库检索作为辅助性的研究工具。

书籍目录

Introduction0.1 Motivations for the Study0.1.1 Unaccusative verbs as a difficult area for L2 learners0.1.2 L2 acquisition of unaccusative verbs as an enduring hot topic for L2 research0.1.3 Wide disparities between studies in and outside China0.2 Significance of the Study0.2.1 Theoretical significance0.2.2 Pedagogical significance0.2.3 Methodological significance0.3 Overview of the MonographPart I Literature ReviewChapter One: Theoretical Background1.1 Overview1.2 Framework of Analysis1.3 The Unaccusative Hypothesis1.4 The Unaccusative Trap Hypothesis1.4.1 Foundations1.4.2 Contents1.4.3 Predictions1.5 The Unaccusative Hierarchy Hypothesis1.6 The rulebased theory of learning ahemating unaccusativ1.7 SummaryChapter Two: English and Chinese Unaecusative Verbs2.1 Overview2.2 English Unaccusative Verbs2.2.1 Subclasses of English unaccusative verbs2.2.2 Diagnostic constructions for English unaccusative verbs2.3 Chinese Unaccusative Verbs2.3.1 Surface unaccusativity and definiteness effect2.3.2 Existential sentences as diagnostics for Chinese unaccusative verbs2.3.3 Subclasses of Chinese unaccusative verbs2.4 Comparison between English and Chinese Unaccusative Verbs2.4.1 Similarities between English and Chinese unaccusative verbs2.4.2 Differences between English and Chinese unaccusative2.4.3 Possible effects on Chinese learners acquisition of English unaccusative verbs2.5 SummaryChapter Three: Previous Studies of L2 Acquisition of English Unaccusative Verbs3.1 Overview3.2 Previous Studies outside China3.2.1 Zobl （1989）3.2.2 Yip （1995）3.2.3 Oshita （1997）3.2.4 Hwang （1999）3.2.5 Hirakawa （2000）3.2.6 Ju （2000）3.2.7 Deguehi and Oshita （2003）3.2.8 Summary of the previous studies outside China3.3 Previous Studies in China3.3.1 Y. Cai （1998）3.3.2 J.T. Cai （2000）3.3.3 Yu （2002）3.3.4 J.T. Cai （2005）3.3.5 Summary of the previous studies in China3.4 Major Issues Investigated in the Previous Studies3.4.1 Unaccusatives versus unergatives3.4.2 Nonahemating versus alternating unaccusatives3.4.3 Betweenverb variations among unaccusatives3.5 Unsolved Issues and Weaknesses in the Previous Studies3.6 Attempts Made in the Present Study3.7 SummaryPart II MethodologyChapter Four: Research Design4.1 Overview4.2 Research Questions4.3 Participants4.4 Target Words4.5 Instruments4.5.1 Written production task4.5.2 Acceptability judgment task4.5.3 Interviews4.5.4 Textbook corpus survey4.6 Data Collection4.6.1 Collection of written production and acceptability judgment data4.6.2 Collection of interview data4.6.3 Collection of textbook corpus data4.7 Data Analysis4.7.1 Analysis of written production data4.7.2 Scoring of acceptability judgment data4.7.3 Transcription of interview data4.7.4 Analysis of textbook corpus data4.7.5 Principle of analyzing betweenverb variations4.7.6 Statistical tools4.8 SummaryPart III Results and DiscussionChapter Five: Unaccusatives versus Unergatives5.1 Overview5.2 Results5.2.1 Results of passivization5.2.2 Results of avoidance5.2.3 Results of the postverbal NP structures5.2.4 Results of causativization5.3 DiscussionChapter Six: Nonalternating versus Alternating Unaccusatives6.1 Overview6.2 Acquisition Sequence6.2.1 Sequence in avoidance6.2.2 Sequence in passivization6.2.3 Summary of avoidance and passivization6.3 Acquisition Problems6.3.1 Nonalternating unaccusatives6.3.2 Alternating unaccusatives6.3.3 Comparison between nonalternating and alternating unaccusatives6.4 Developmental Patterns6.4.1 Nonalternating unaccusatives6.4.2 Alternating unaccusatives6.4.3 Comparison between nonalternating and alternating unaccusatives6. 5 DiscussionChapter Seven: Betweenverb Variations among Unaccusatives7.1 Overview7.2 Betweenverb Variations among Nonalternating Unaccusatives7.2.1 Written production results7.2.2 Acceptability judgment results7.3.3 Summary of written production and acceptability judgment results7.2.4 Contributing factors7.3 Betweenverb Variations among Alternating Unaccusatives7.3.1 Written production results7.3.2 Acceptability judgment results7.3.3 Summary of written production and acceptability judgment results7.3.4 Contributing factors7.4 Discussion7.4.1 Partly supporting the rulebased theory of learning alternating unaccusatives7.4.2 Detecting the selective transfer of L17.4.3 Unveiling the important role of L2 inputPart IV ConclusionChapter Eight: Conclusion8.1 Overview8.2 Major Findings8.3 Implications8.3.1 Theoretical implications8.3.2 Pedagogical implications8.3.3 Methodological implications8.4 Limitations8.5 Suggestions for Future StudiesReferencesAppendicesAppendix IAppendix II

图书封面

 中国学习者习得英语非宾格动词的新实证研究/外语语言文学博士论丛下载