中国知识产权典型案例

作者简介

《中国知识产权典型案例(英汉双语)》选取中国最高人民法院及地方法院共26个近年来较为典型的知识产权案例进行编译，提炼案情，总结裁判要旨，并进行相关法理评析。全书分为两编，第一编15个案例由判决原文的中、英文编译稿组成；第二编11个案例主要对判决进行英文编译，而判决原文作为附录，以便展示法院判决的要点和相关法律的适用全貌。

读者对象：知识产权领域的科研人员和实务工作者，以及普通大众。

书籍目录

Part 1
　Case l Strix Limited(UN)v．Ningbo Shenglida Electric Manufacturin9
C0Ltd and Huapu Hypermarket C0Ltd，on patent infringement
　Case 2 Zhejiang Hangzhou Xinfu Pharmaceutical C0Ltd
V．Shandong Xinfa Pharmaceutical C0Ltd and Shanghai ACT Int．C0Ltd on
retrial of dispute concerning royalties for temporary protection
for patent for invention and opposition to the j urisdiction of
patent infringement
　Case 3 Jining Pressureless Boiler Factory v．Patent
Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office and
Shu Xuezhang(the third party)，on retrial of dispute of invalidation
of patent for invention
　Case 4 Zhang Jianhua v．Shenyang Zhilian Gaoceng Gongnuan Jis．huC0
Ltd．on patent infringement of utility model
　Case 5 Shen Qiheng v．Shanghai Shengmao Transport
Infrastructure Project C0Ltd，on patent infringement dispute of
utility
　Case 6 Hua Jiping and Hefei Andihua Import and Export C0．Ltd V
Shanghai Sportin Trading C0Ltd，Fengli Machinery Factory Co Ltd of
Rudong County and Nantong Tianlong Plasnc Industry C0Ltd。on dispute
of patent infringement
　Case 7 Guangdong Senses Culture Communication C0Ltd
v．Hon9
Rudin9，Han Wei，Guangzhou Audio&Video Publishin9 House，Chongqing
Sanxia。Disc Development C0Ltd，and Liansheng Commerce Chain
C0Ltd，on．retri al of copyright infringement
　Case 8 China Federation of Literary and Art Circles Publishing
Cofporanon，Tianjin Tianbao Culture Developing Corporation，and
Tianjin Tianbao CD Corporation v．Guangdong Changj in Visual and
Sound Products Corporation，Hebei Province Hebei Bangzi Opera
Theater etc0n dispute over copyright
　……
Part 2

编辑推荐

《中国知识产权典型案例(英汉双语)》是由知识产权出版社出版的。

内容概要

编者：郑胜利 (意大利)玛丽娜·提莫泰欧 龚红兵

章节摘录

版权页：The Court of first instance deems that the allegedly infringing product has three regressiontechnical features and one equivalent technical feature as compared to the patent in suit,making it inferior to the patent technology of Zhilian Company. So the technology whichGaolian Company holds, as a regression technology, infringes the Zhilian Company'sexclusive patent right of exploitation. According to the patent description, the water circuit breaker has a complicatedbreathing apparatus that can inhale and exhale regularly when the system is unstable, inorder to maintain the normal pressure in the system. The system adopts water sealtechnology. The buffer device of Gaolian Company, however, has a check exhaust valvethat is only able to perform exhalation but riot inhalation. As a result, the system cannotrun when it is unstable, especially when the pre:ssure in the buffer device is below the atmospheric pressure. The check exhaust valve of Gaolian Company, compared with the breathing apparatus of the patented water circuit breaker Zhilian Company holds, is aregression technology that can be achieved by any technician skilled in HVAC areas byreading the description without any creative work.   There is a threaded guide plate in the water circuit breaker of Zhilian Company, which ismade for water-gas separation by turning the water in the water circuit breaker intomembrane flow. Though the buffer device of Gaolian Company applies the membrane flowprinciple too, it does not have the threaded guide plate that reinforces the decompressionand deceleration effect. So the buffer device of Gaolian Company is not as good as the patented technology of water circuit breaker of Zhilian Company, thus becomes an otherregression technical feature.

图书封面

---

 中国知识产权典型案例下载

---